Download Da 2166 9 1 Form

Misconception 1: The DA 2166 9 1 form is only for negative evaluations.

This form is used for both positive and negative assessments of a Non-Commissioned Officer (NCO). It provides a comprehensive overview of an NCO's performance, including strengths and areas for improvement. Raters can highlight achievements and contributions, not just shortcomings.

Misconception 2: The signature on the form means agreement with the evaluation.

The signature of the rated NCO does not indicate agreement or disagreement with the evaluation. Instead, it confirms that the NCO has reviewed the report and that the administrative data is correct. This understanding is crucial for maintaining transparency in the evaluation process.

Misconception 3: Only the rater completes the evaluation.

While the rater plays a significant role in filling out the DA 2166 9 1 form, the senior rater and, if applicable, a supplementary reviewer also contribute. Each has specific responsibilities, ensuring a well-rounded evaluation that reflects multiple perspectives on the NCO's performance.

Misconception 4: The form does not affect future assignments or promotions.

The evaluations recorded on the DA 2166 9 1 form can significantly impact an NCO's career. They play a role in determining future assignments, promotions, and other opportunities. A thorough and fair evaluation can enhance an NCO's prospects for advancement within the military.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an essential document used in the evaluation of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. Along with this form, several other documents are often required or recommended to ensure a comprehensive evaluation process. Below is a list of these documents, each serving a specific purpose in the evaluation and administrative process.

• DA Form 2166-9: This is the NCO Evaluation Report that covers a broader time frame than the DA Form 2166-9-1. It provides a summary of an NCO's performance over a specific rating period and includes feedback from the rater and senior rater.
• DA Form 4856: This is the Developmental Counseling Form. It is used to document counseling sessions, providing a record of discussions about performance, goals, and areas for improvement.
• DA Form 705: This form records the results of the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). It is important for evaluating an NCO's physical readiness and overall fitness level.
• DA Form 5500/5501: These forms are used to record body composition data. They are essential for ensuring that NCOs meet Army weight standards and are part of the overall assessment of fitness.
• Maryland Lease Agreement Form: To effectively manage your rental agreements, consider the necessary Maryland lease agreement details to secure a sound understanding between landlord and tenant.
• DA Form 1059: This is the Academic Evaluation Report. It documents an NCO's performance in military schools and training courses, providing insight into their professional development.
• DA Form 4187: This form is used for personnel actions, including requests for reassignments, promotions, and other administrative changes. It helps track an NCO's career progression.
• DA Form 2-1: This is the Personnel Qualification Record. It provides a comprehensive overview of an NCO's qualifications, assignments, and training history, serving as a vital reference during evaluations.
• NCOER Support Form: This document is used to assist in the preparation of the NCO Evaluation Report. It helps NCOs and their raters outline expectations and performance objectives for the rating period.
• Commander's Letter of Recommendation: While not a formal Army form, this letter can provide additional context regarding an NCO's performance and potential, especially during promotion boards.

Each of these documents plays a crucial role in the evaluation process, providing a well-rounded view of an NCO's performance, potential, and areas for development. Properly utilizing these forms ensures that evaluations are fair, comprehensive, and beneficial for the NCO's career progression.

When filling out the DA 2166 9 1 form, consider these important guidelines:

• Do ensure accuracy in all personal information, including name, SSN, and rank. Errors can lead to complications.
• Do provide complete details for each section, especially in the duty description and performance evaluation. This clarity is crucial for accurate assessments.
• Do use the correct email format for both the rater and senior rater. Ensure it ends in .gov or .mil to maintain security and professionalism.
• Do review the entire form before submission. A second look can help catch mistakes or omissions.
• Do understand the appeals process outlined in AR 623-3. Familiarity with this process can be beneficial if disagreements arise.

• Don’t rush through the form. Taking your time can prevent errors that might lead to delays.
• Don’t leave any sections blank unless specifically instructed. Incomplete forms may be rejected.
• Don’t use informal language or abbreviations. Maintain a professional tone throughout the form.
• Don’t forget to sign the form where required. Missing signatures can invalidate the submission.
• Don’t ignore the privacy statement associated with the form. Be aware of how your information will be handled.